Table of Contents
The "deadlock" of Hong Kong's property market is the product of multiple structural contradictions, the root causes of which involve the land system, economic model, social distribution and political game. To break through the difficulties, we need to go beyond the traditional supply and demand adjustment thinking and approach it from the perspective of systemic reform. This platform deeply analyzes the architecture and possible solutions:
1. Deep Dismantling of Structural Contradictions
1. Land monopoly and institutional shortage
– Concentration of land supply rights: About 40% of land in Hong Kong is held by private developers (including agricultural land and brownfield sites), and the government has limited land available for development. The release of land in the New Territories is inefficient due to the complex inheritance rights under the New Territories Ordinance.
- Rigid planning procedures: The Town Planning Board’s review process is lengthy and environmental assessments are often abused by judicial review, resulting in delays in planning for projects such as the Northern Metropolitan Area.
- Politicization of land reclamation: The public’s doubts about “Lantau Tomorrow” are not only due to environmental protection, but also reflect their distrust of the government’s allocation of resources.
2. Single economic structure and capital solidification
- Financialization of real estate: About 30% of Hong Kong’s GDP is directly or indirectly driven by real estate, and the proportion of mortgages in bank credit has long exceeded 40%, forming a vicious cycle of “falling housing prices → economic recession → market rescue → housing price rebound”.
– Industrial hollowing out: Over-reliance on finance and real estate squeezes investment in science and technology innovation and manufacturing, resulting in a shortage of high-skilled jobs. Young people are forced to enter real estate-related industries, exacerbating resource mismatch.
3. Social stratification and imbalanced housing distribution
– Public housing policy is ineffective: the waiting time for public housing is as long as 6 years, and the population living in subdivided flats exceeds 220,000, but the government insists on “capping public housing” (accounting for 30% of the total housing stock), and the middle class is forced to compete in the private market.
– Generational wealth gap: 40% families own their own homes (mostly purchased in the low-price era), and the new generation needs to earn more than 50% to pay for the mortgage, resulting in stagnation of social mobility.
4. Transnational capital and geopolitical disturbances
– Offshore capital pool effect: Under the linked exchange rate system, the Hong Kong dollar has become a safe haven in the game between China and the United States. From 2010 to 2020, foreign capital accounted for an average of 15% in real estate transactions, pushing up asset prices.
– Politicization of identity: The immigration wave after the National Security Law released about 50,000 residential units, but the withdrawal of foreign capital and the fluctuation of talent policies offset the supply effect.
II. Potential Paths for Systemic Reform
1. Land system: breaking monopoly and releasing power
1. Forced land recovery reform
– Amend the Lands Resumption Ordinance to expand the definition of “public purpose” to “alleviate the housing crisis” and directly expropriate brownfield sites in the New Territories, bypassing legal challenges.
– Referring to Singapore’s land reserve model, set a cap on land holdings for private developers and impose a high vacancy tax on any land exceeding the limit.
2. Innovative development mechanism
- Implement “land bonds”: The government issues special funds to purchase farmland, and the original owners can share the post-development profits, reducing the resistance to expropriation.
- Pilot “adverse possession”: Allow eligible citizens to apply for the right to use land that has been idle for a long time.
2. Economic transformation: de-real estate and industrial reconstruction
1. Establishing a sovereign wealth fund to divert capital
- Inject part of the land auction proceeds into industrial investment funds, with targeted investments in semiconductors, biotechnology and other real industries to reduce capital’s reliance on the property market.
2. Revolution in tax structure
- Introduce a “progressive property value-added tax”: levy a 50% price difference tax on the transfer of properties held for more than 10 years to curb speculative hoarding.
- Cancel the “tough measures” and impose a “luxury home vacancy tax” instead (e.g. the tax 20% for residential buildings over 200 square meters that have been vacant for half a year).
3. Housing Allocation: Multi-tiered Supply System
1. Market-oriented reform of public housing
- Launching “Public Housing for Rent or Purchase 2.0”: tenants can purchase the unit at cost price after living in the unit for 5 years, with a lock-in period of 10 years, thus releasing the expectation of upward mobility.
- Introducing “public-private partnership bidding”: private organizations can bid for the management rights of public housing and exchange services for land development quotas.
2. Activate private stock
- Promote the “legalization of subdivided flats + safety standard certification”: provide subsidies to release 100,000 low-priced houses in the short term.
- Mandatory “release of inheritance property”: Properties with no heirs will be managed and rented out by the government and auctioned off after 5 years.
(IV) Regional collaboration: looking beyond Hong Kong to see housing
1. Transnational "work-residence separation" policy package
– Cooperate with cities in the Greater Bay Area to launch the “Hong Kong Community”: purchasing real estate in designated areas can obtain Hong Kong residency, and a cross-border high-speed rail commuter line will be opened simultaneously.
– The Hong Kong government subsidizes companies to set up branches in Shenzhen, encourages remote working, and disperses housing demand.
2. Financial instrument innovation
- Issuance of Greater Bay Area Housing REITs: Hong Kong residents can invest in Mainland rental housing securitization products to obtain stable returns to hedge against high local rents.
3. Political resistance and implementation risks
1. Confrontation of vested interest groups
– The four major real estate developers use their functional seats in the Legislative Council to obstruct land reform. Their voice needs to be weakened by combining central power (such as changes in the political environment after the enactment of Article 23 of the Basic Law).
2. Balancing the Divided Public Opinion
– The middle class opposes the assetization of public housing (worrying about diluting the value of real estate), and a "dual track system" needs to be designed: the core areas maintain the status quo, and the new development areas try out new mechanisms.
3. Capital outflow risk
– Radical reforms may trigger a short-term decline in the property market by 20%-30%. It is necessary to establish a foreign exchange reserve buffer pool in advance and coordinate cross-border capital controls with the mainland.
IV. Historical Opportunity and Time Window
The current slowdown in Hong Kong’s economic growth (estimated to be 2.8% in 2023), the inverted interest rate gap between China and the United States, and the immigration wave have created a “stress test window period”, which can be used to promote reforms. If we miss the period of natural population decline in the next 3-5 years (the labor force is expected to decrease by 24% in 2041), structural adjustments will be more difficult.
Conclusion
The essence of Hong Kong’s property market predicament is the ultimate collision between the capitalist governance model and people’s livelihood demands. To break the impasse, we need both the courage of top-level design (such as activating Article 120 of the Basic Law to redefine land property rights) and the flexibility of micro-innovation (such as using blockchain technology to enable fragmented real estate transactions). Only by redefining the housing issue from an "economic issue" to "reconstructing the social contract" can we break out of the century-long cycle of high housing prices.
Further reading:
